GMA 500 vs ATI Radeon 7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1600not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)PowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameR100Poulsbo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2000 (25 years ago)2 March 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed166 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs21
TMUs64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.3ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 2 March 2008
Chip lithography 180 nm 130 nm

GMA 500 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 and GMA 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 500 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
Intel GMA 500
GMA 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 17 votes

Rate GMA 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7200 or GMA 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.