ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon 7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1611not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameR100Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2000 (26 years ago)7 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1600
Core clock speed166 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors30 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt208 Watt
Texture fill rate166.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs680
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 7 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 208 Watt

ATI 7200 has 804% lower power consumption.

ATI V8800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 and FirePro V8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V8800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7200 or FirePro V8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.