Arc Pro A30M vs ATI Radeon 7200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 7200 with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

ATI 7200
2000
32 MB DDR, 23 Watt
0.01

Arc Pro A30M outperforms ATI 7200 by a whopping 151900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1526348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.0321.19
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR100DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2000 (24 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors30 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 7200 0.01
Arc Pro A30M 15.20
+151900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 7200 2
Arc Pro A30M 5862
+293000%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 15.20
Recency 1 April 2000 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 50 Watt

ATI 7200 has 117.4% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has a 151900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 22 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 7200 is a desktop card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.