Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI 7200 64 MB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR100Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2000 (25 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048 ×2
Core clock speed166 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors30 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate1128.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs232 ×2
TMUs6128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data315 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone3x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB3 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s288.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 375 Watt

ATI 7200 64 MB has 1530.4% lower power consumption.

R9 280X2, on the other hand, has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7200 64 MB and Radeon R9 280X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB
Radeon 7200 64 MB
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
Radeon R9 280X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7200 64 MB or Radeon R9 280X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.