Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1607211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.65
Power efficiencyno data10.08
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV100Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 February 2001 (25 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed183 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors30 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate0.55336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed183 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.928 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1
Pro WX 8200 12578
+628800%
Samples: 106

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2001 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 230 Watt

ATI 7000 has 900% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7000 and Radeon Pro WX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7000 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 7000 or Radeon Pro WX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.