GeForce RTX 3090 vs ATI Radeon 7000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1551	31
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	14.98
Power efficiency	no data	13.50
Architecture	Rage 6 (2000−2007)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	RV100	GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 February 2001 (24 years ago)	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	10496
Core clock speed	183 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	30 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	350 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.55	556.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	35.58 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	112
TMUs	3	328
Tensor Cores	no data	328
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	336 mm
Width	1-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	24 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	183 MHz	1219 MHz
Memory bandwidth	2.928 GB/s	936.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	193
1440p	no data	127
4K	no data	85

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	7.77
1440p	no data	11.80
4K	no data	17.64

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	19 February 2001	1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	24 GB
Chip lithography	180 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	350 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---