NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon 7000
- Interface AGP 4x
- Core clock speed 183 MHz
- Max video memory 32 MB
- Memory type DDR
- Memory clock speed 366 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 576 MHz
- Max video memory 896 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 1998 MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | RV100 | GT200 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 February 2001 (21 year old) | 16 September 2008 (14 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $299 |
| Current price | $102 | $307 (1x MSRP) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 216 |
| Core clock speed | 183 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 30 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 182 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.55 | 41.47 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 536.5 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 896 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 366 MHz | 1998 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.928 GB/s | 111.9 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | 1.3 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 19 February 2001 | 16 September 2008 |
| Memory bus width | 64 | 448 |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.928 | 111.9 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 182 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 from AMD is Radeon HD 6550A.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
