Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs ATI 7000 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV100Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 February 2001 (23 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed133 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors30 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate0.4224.0
Floating-point processing powerno data7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed133 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.128 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2001 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 230 Watt

ATI 7000 PCI has 900% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7000 PCI and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7000 PCI is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7000 PCI
Radeon 7000 PCI
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.