Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.67no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Beema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)23 February 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76864
Core clock speed2000 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate105.63.976
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS0.06362 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs488
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 23 February 2016
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

R1E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
AMD Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1098 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.