GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 vs Radeon 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.03no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRembrandt+G98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688
Core clock speed2000 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,100 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate105.62.320
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs484
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB16 KB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-I
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 4 June 2008
Chip lithography 6 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS DDR2, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and GeForce 9300M GS DDR2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS DDR2
GeForce 9300M GS DDR2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1135 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or GeForce 9300M GS DDR2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.