Radeon PRO W9070 vs 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed1500 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60760.3
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs24256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores664
L0 Cache96 KB1 MB
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB
L3 Cache8 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 304 Watt

Radeon 660M has 660% lower power consumption.

PRO W9070, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and Radeon PRO W9070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W9070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 490 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 660M or Radeon PRO W9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.