RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs Radeon 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking329not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRDNA 2 RembrandtAD103
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3849728
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60643.0
Floating-point processing power1.459 gflopsno data
ROPs16112
TMUs24304

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 120 Watt

Radeon 660M has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 280 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.