RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon 660M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 556 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 15.32 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Rembrandt+ | AD107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | 2010 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,100 million | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 45.60 | 193.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.459 TFLOPS | 12.35 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 |
| TMUs | 24 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 24 |
| L0 Cache | 96 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 21 March 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
Radeon 660M has 25% lower power consumption.
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
