GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs Radeon 660M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking329not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Power efficiency28.15no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+AD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38418176
Core clock speed1500 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2565 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate45.601,457
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS93.24 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs24568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Cores6142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.15 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 660M has 1400% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and GeForce RTX 4090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 305 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 3174 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.