ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X vs Radeon 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Rage PRO
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)1 March 1997 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,100 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate45.600.08
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs241
Ray Tracing Cores6no data
L0 Cache96 KBno data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 6 nm 350 nm

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 25 years, and a 5733% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 492 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 660M or 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.