Xe DG1 OEM vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking757not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 23DG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed1082 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate38.9862.00
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs3240
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data178 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

Xe DG1 OEM has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and Xe DG1 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook graphics card while Xe DG1 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
Intel Xe DG1 OEM
Xe DG1 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Xe DG1 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or Xe DG1 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.