Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking756not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 23GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048 ×2
Core clock speed1082 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98192.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS6.169 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs32128 ×2
L1 Cache128 KB768 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 200 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

P5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.