GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 23G98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5128
Core clock speed1082 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate38.982.320
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-I
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s11.23 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.