ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking759not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code namePolaris 23Rage 4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (7 years ago)16 June 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1082 MHz134 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate38.980.54
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz134 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1.072 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 16 June 1999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 35 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.