A10 PCIe vs Radeon 630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking709not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.10no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5129216
Core clock speed1082 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98488.2
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS31.24 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s600.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

Radeon 630 has 200% lower power consumption.

A10 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and A10 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while A10 PCIe is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA A10 PCIe
A10 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate A10 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.