Jetson T4000 vs Radeon 625

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking857not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 24GB10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)27 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed730 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58161.6
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS7.757 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache96 KB3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data243 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s273.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 27 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

Jetson T4000 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 625 and Jetson T4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 625 is a notebook graphics card while Jetson T4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625
NVIDIA Jetson T4000
Jetson T4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 151 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson T4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 625 or Jetson T4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.