Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs AMD Radeon 620

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Radeon 620
2.31

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms Radeon 620 by 9% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking809788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.34no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 24Lakefield GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 August 2019 (4 years old)28 May 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$67 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38464
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon 620 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 620 2.31
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 2.52
+9.1%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms Radeon 620 by 9% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon 620 1730
+33.5%
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1296

Radeon 620 outperforms UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) by 34% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−30%
13
+30%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Radeon 620 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 30% faster than Radeon 620

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 50% faster than the Radeon 620.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is ahead in 25 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (49%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.31 2.52
Recency 12 August 2019 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon 620 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU). The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 65 votes

Rate AMD Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.