ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit vs 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking899not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code namePolaris 24R350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed730 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate24.583.040
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt

Radeon 620 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 128-bit, on the other hand, has 6.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 620 and Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 620 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 68 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 620 or Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.