L4 vs Radeon 610M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 610M with L4, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 610M
2023
15 Watt
2.85

L4 outperforms 610M by a whopping 947% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking787188
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Power efficiency13.2128.82
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDragon RangeAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287424
Core clock speed400 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt72 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60489.6
Floating-point processing power0.5632 TFLOPS30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Cores260

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data169 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data300.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 610M 2.85
L4 29.85
+947%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 610M 1100
L4 11518
+947%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−900%
130−140
+900%
1440p96
−942%
1000−1050
+942%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−926%
400−450
+926%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−900%
140−150
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−926%
400−450
+926%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
−900%
100−105
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−900%
70−75
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−926%
400−450
+926%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

This is how Radeon 610M and L4 compete in popular games:

  • L4 is 900% faster in 1080p
  • L4 is 942% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 29.85
Recency 3 January 2023 21 March 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 72 Watt

Radeon 610M has 380% lower power consumption.

L4, on the other hand, has a 947.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The L4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 610M is a notebook card while L4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
NVIDIA L4
L4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 742 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 32 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.