Switch GPU 16nm vs Radeon 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking666not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.37no data
Power efficiency7.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameLexaGM20B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 April 2017 (8 years ago)16 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512256
Core clock speed1100 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHz768 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate37.8612.29
Floating-point processing power1.211 TFLOPS0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3216
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Length145 mm239 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth56 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 16 August 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 550 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Switch GPU 16nm, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 550 and Switch GPU 16nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 550
Radeon 550
NVIDIA Switch GPU 16nm
Switch GPU 16nm

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 36 votes

Rate Radeon 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 9 votes

Rate Switch GPU 16nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 550 or Switch GPU 16nm, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.