Radeon Pro W6300M vs 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency5.33no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLexaNavi 24
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 April 2017 (8 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1183 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate28.3997.92
Floating-point processing power0.9085 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache96 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s64 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Pro W6300M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540
Radeon 540
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M
Radeon Pro W6300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 53 votes

Rate Radeon 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540 or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.