RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon 540

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking780not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency5.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 April 2017 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed1183 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2010 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate28.39193.0
Floating-point processing power0.9085 TFLOPS12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache96 KB3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 53 votes

Rate Radeon 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540 or RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.