FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking780not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency5.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameLexaCapsaicin
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 April 2017 (8 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096 ×2
Core clock speed1183 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate28.39217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.9085 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs24256 ×2
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width32 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 540 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 53 votes

Rate Radeon 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.