ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP vs 535 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code namePolaris 24R420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed730 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate24.585.700
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs2412
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 48 Watt

535 Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 4.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 535 Mobile and Radeon X800 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 535 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Radeon 535 Mobile
ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP
Radeon X800 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 173 votes

Rate Radeon 535 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 535 Mobile or Radeon X800 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.