Radeon Pro V340 vs 530X Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.36
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 24Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)26 August 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed730 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58336.0
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 230 Watt

530X Mobile has 360% lower power consumption.

Pro V340, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530X Mobile and Radeon Pro V340. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530X Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro V340 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
Radeon 530X Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro V340
Radeon Pro V340

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 530X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.