AMD Radeon 530 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

UHD Graphics 620
2.66
+1.9%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon 530 by 2% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking771775
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Value for money0.790.64
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-Refresh GT2Meso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2017 (6 years old)21 March 2017 (7 years old)
Current price$706 $627
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 620 has 23% better value for money than Radeon 530.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24384
Core clock speed300 MHz1024 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6024.50
Floating-point performanceno data784.1 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon 530 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR3/GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.1.103+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 620 2.66
+1.9%
Radeon 530 2.61

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon 530 by 2% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 620 1030
+1.7%
Radeon 530 1013

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon 530 by 2% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 7330
+15.7%
Radeon 530 6338

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon 530 by 16% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 1744
Radeon 530 2327
+33.4%

Radeon 530 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 33% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 620 1168
Radeon 530 1542
+32%

Radeon 530 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 32% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 620 9324
+1.2%
Radeon 530 9210

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon 530 by 1% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

UHD Graphics 620 88746
Radeon 530 107458
+21.1%

Radeon 530 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by 21% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

UHD Graphics 620 19
+12.9%
Radeon 530 17

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon 530 by 13% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−23.1%
16
+23.1%
1440p16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
4K8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−100%
16
+100%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 6
−50%
9
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−66.7%
20
+66.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5
−20%
6−7
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−50%
9
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+200%
4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
−66.7%
10
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4
+0%
4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+125%
4
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−83.3%
11
+83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−100%
6
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon 530 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Radeon 530 is 23.1% faster than UHD Graphics 620

1440p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 14.3% faster than Radeon 530

4K resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 14.3% faster than Radeon 530

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 200% faster than the Radeon 530.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 530 is 400% faster than the UHD Graphics 620.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is ahead in 6 tests (11%)
  • Radeon 530 is ahead in 12 tests (23%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (66%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.66 2.61
Recency 1 September 2017 21 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon 530. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3692 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 659 votes

Rate AMD Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.