Switch GPU 16nm vs Radeon 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking869not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameWestonGM20B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)16 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed730 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz768 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.5812.29
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2416
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Lengthno data239 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 16 August 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Switch GPU 16nm has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and Switch GPU 16nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Switch GPU 16nm is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
NVIDIA Switch GPU 16nm
Switch GPU 16nm

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 784 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 9 votes

Rate Switch GPU 16nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or Switch GPU 16nm, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.