HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics vs 530

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Radeon 530
2.61
+31.2%

530 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 31% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking775841
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.64no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)no data
GPU code nameMesono data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date21 March 2017 (7 years old)1 August 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$627 $90
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1024 MHz720 / 650 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.50no data
Floating-point performance784.1 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon 530 and Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.011
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.61
+31.2%
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 1.99

530 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 31% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon 530 6338
+12.3%
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 5644

530 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 12% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon 530 2327
+16.1%
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 2004

530 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 16% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon 530 1542
+79.1%
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 861

530 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 79% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon 530 9210
+44.3%
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 6383

530 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 44% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+23.1%
13
−23.1%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Battlefield 5 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Battlefield 5 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
−175%
10−12
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4
−100%
8−9
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how Radeon 530 and HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Radeon 530 is 23.1% faster than HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 530 is 900% faster than the HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics is 175% faster than the Radeon 530.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 530 is ahead in 34 tests (71%)
  • HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (25%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.61 1.99
Recency 21 March 2017 1 August 2013

The Radeon 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 658 votes

Rate AMD Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 16 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8650G HD 8570M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.