GeForce G110M vs Radeon 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking872not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameWestonG96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed730 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate24.583.200
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 14 Watt

Radeon 530 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G110M, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GeForce G110M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 785 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or GeForce G110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.