P102-101 vs Radeon 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking955not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBanksGP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203200
Core clock speed1030 MHz1557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1670 MHz
Number of transistors690 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60334.0
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS10.69 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs20200
L1 Cache80 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB10 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s320.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

Radeon 520 has 400% lower power consumption.

P102-101, on the other hand, has a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 and P102-101. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 is a notebook graphics card while P102-101 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 376 votes

Rate Radeon 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate P102-101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 or P102-101, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.