Jetson TX2 GPU vs Radeon 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking943not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBanksGP10B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320256
Core clock speed1030 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1465 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6023.44
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.7501 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2016
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Lengthno data87 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth36 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-6.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Jetson TX2 GPU has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 and Jetson TX2 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 is a notebook graphics card while Jetson TX2 GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520
Radeon 520
NVIDIA Jetson TX2 GPU
Jetson TX2 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 372 votes

Rate Radeon 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 14 votes

Rate Jetson TX2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 or Jetson TX2 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.