H200 SXM 141 GB vs Radeon 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking882not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.84no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBanksGH100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016896
Core clock speed1030 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors690 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate20.601,045
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs20528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB141 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s3.36 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 700 Watt

Radeon 520 has 1300% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 6950% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 is a notebook card while H200 SXM 141 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520
Radeon 520
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 338 votes

Rate Radeon 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.