GeForce 6200 LE PCI vs Radeon 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking943not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBanksNV43 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)11 October 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed1030 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors690 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.601.200
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs204
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s4.256 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 11 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

Radeon 520 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 and GeForce 6200 LE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6200 LE PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520
Radeon 520
NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE PCI
GeForce 6200 LE PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 372 votes

Rate Radeon 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 LE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 or GeForce 6200 LE PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.