VIA S3G Chrome 645 vs Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Chrome (2008−2012)
GPU code nameBanksVX11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)4 September 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32064
Core clock speed1030 MHz699 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate20.605.592
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.08947 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth36 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.0
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.0
OpenGL4.63.2
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 4 September 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 9 Watt

520 Mobile GDDR5 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

VIA S3G Chrome 645, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5 and VIA S3G Chrome 645. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5
Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5
VIA S3G Chrome 645
S3G Chrome 645

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 13 votes

Rate Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate VIA S3G Chrome 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5 or VIA S3G Chrome 645, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.