Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs 520 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBanksNavi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Core clock speed1030 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2920 MHz
Number of transistors690 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60747.5
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs20256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s644.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

520 OEM has 500% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 OEM and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520 OEM
Radeon 520 OEM
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 520 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 OEM or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.