RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon 520 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBanksGB203
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3208960
Core clock speed1030 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1337 MHz
Number of transistors690 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60374.4
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

520 OEM has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 OEM and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 OEM is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520 OEM
Radeon 520 OEM
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 520 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 OEM or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.