RTX A400 vs Radeon 520 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.98
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBanksGA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320768
Core clock speed1030 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors690 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6042.29
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2024
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX A400 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 520 OEM and RTX A400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 520 OEM is a desktop graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520 OEM
Radeon 520 OEM
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon 520 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 46 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 520 OEM or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.