GeForce 8400M G vs ATI Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.05
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRS780G86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2008 (16 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores408
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors180 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.4003.200
Floating-point processing power0.028 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.01.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm

ATI 3100 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP and GeForce 8400M G. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP
Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Radeon 3100 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 21 vote

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.