Radeon RX 5500M vs ATI 3100 IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.75
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRS780Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 August 2008 (16 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401408
Core clock speed344 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors180 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rate1.376144.8
Floating-point processing power0.02752 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.02.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

RX 5500M has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 3100 IGP and Radeon RX 5500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 3100 IGP is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
Radeon 3100 IGP
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Radeon 3100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.