UHD Graphics vs ATI Radeon 3000 IGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated604
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Power efficiencyno data38.24
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRS780Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2009 (15 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40256
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors180 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40012.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics has a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 3000 IGP and UHD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 3000 IGP is a desktop card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
Radeon 3000 IGP
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 291 vote

Rate Radeon 3000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6337 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.