Playstation 3 RSX 40nm vs ATI Radeon 3000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRS780RSX-CXD5302
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2009 (16 years ago)4 October 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed350 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors180 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40013.20
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3ES 1.1
OpenCL1.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

Playstation 3 RSX 40nm has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 3000 IGP and Playstation 3 RSX 40nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 3000 IGP is a desktop graphics card while Playstation 3 RSX 40nm is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
Radeon 3000 IGP
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 40nm
Playstation 3 RSX 40nm

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 319 votes

Rate Radeon 3000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 40nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 3000 IGP or Playstation 3 RSX 40nm, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.