GeForce RTX 4080 vs ATI Radeon 2100 IGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated3
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.95
Power efficiencyno data19.50
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRS740AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2008 (16 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data9728
Core clock speed400 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors120 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data320 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600761.5
Floating-point processing powerno data48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs4304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data716.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2008 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

RTX 4080 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 2100 IGP and GeForce RTX 4080. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 2100 IGP
Radeon 2100 IGP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Radeon 2100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4296 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.