Arc B370 vs RTX PRO 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking615not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.84no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGB202Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2025 (1 year ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240641280
Core clock speed2017 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2407 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors92,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate1,81096.00
Floating-point processing power115.8 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs17620
TMUs75240
Tensor Cores752no data
Ray Tracing Cores18810
L1 Cache23.5 MB640 KB
L2 Cache128 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16IGP
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7System Shared
Maximum RAM amount96 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1bPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA10.1-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 6000 473
Samples: 1
Arc B370 8256
+1645%
Samples: 11

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 25 Watt

Arc B370 has a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 2300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 6000 and Arc B370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B370 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 80 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.