Graphics 24EU Mobile vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Xe-LP (2025)
GPU code nameGB203Twin Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8960192
Core clock speed790 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1337 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors45,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate374.412.00
Floating-point processing power23.96 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs28012
Tensor Cores280no data
Ray Tracing Cores70no data
L1 Cache8.8 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8Ring Bus
Length167 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 6 Watt

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics 24EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF and Graphics 24EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 24EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile
Graphics 24EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 24EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF or Graphics 24EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.