Radeon RX Vega XTX vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.31no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGB206Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43524096
Core clock speed790 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1630 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate265.2417.3
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6464
TMUs136256
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length167 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0
Shader Model6.85.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 August 2025 8 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 225 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 221.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Radeon RX Vega XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega XTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
AMD Radeon RX Vega XTX
Radeon RX Vega XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Radeon RX Vega XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.